The iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge's greatest compromises make them a no-go for me

Abstract

Each the iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Edge are anticipated to compromise on battery life in trade for thinness.
That is a step backwards, contemplating that nobody is asking for thinner telephones, but persons are all the time asking for extra runtime.
It might be that the telephones are a vital step in direction of a greater future, however as rumored, they will not be getting my cash.

It looks like

iPhone 17
rumors are hitting continuous lately, which is sensible — we’re about 4 months out from launch, so {hardware} particulars must be locked down forward of mass manufacturing. It takes fairly some time to churn out the hundreds of thousands of models Apple must fulfill worldwide launch demand.

The most recent rumor (through The Information), is that with a purpose to obtain its ultra-thin 5.5mm physique, the

iPhone 17 Air
will sport a critical compromise in battery life. How a lot? Allegedly, Apple’s inner testing means that simply 60 to 70% of homeowners will be capable to make it a full day on a single cost, down from about 80 to 90% for different iPhone fashions. The corporate is even stated to be getting ready a brand new battery case, one thing it hasn’t supplied because the discontinued MagSafe Battery Pack.

Comparable rumors have emerged round Samsung’s

Galaxy S25 Edge
. In line with WinFuture, the cellphone could have a 3,900mAh battery — that is extra capability than the iPhone 16, however under the common S25’s 4,000mAh, and far lower than the S25 Extremely’s 5,000mAh. That is put me off each Samsung and Apple’s upcoming “vanguard” telephones, and never simply because everybody prefers larger numbers.

Associated

Is the iPhone 15 still worth buying in 2025? The answer is complicated

Probably, however you should not get one straight from Apple.

Dealing with the established order

As a tech journalist, I is likely to be an exception, however I discover that the majority telephones nonetheless do not have sufficient battery life, by no means thoughts rolling issues again. My present day by day driver is an iPhone 16 Professional, which based on Apple, needs to be able to as much as 22 hours of (streaming) video playback. Sounds spectacular, proper? In follow, nevertheless, I am struggling to think about how that could possibly be attainable. I prefer to placed on Reuters’ video briefing whereas I bathe and alter within the morning, and I am going to typically see the battery drop to 90% or decrease earlier than I even get downstairs for breakfast. On exercise days, it is attainable for the battery to dip under 30% by the point I get into mattress, and that is after a 15- to 16-hour day of principally non-video exercise. If I really spent an hour or two streaming YouTube, I would most likely should put my cellphone in Low Energy Mode sooner or later.

This 12 months, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake.

I would say it is baffling that Apple and Samsung seem like headed within the fallacious path, however actually, it isn’t. Each firms have lengthy put different upgrades forward of battery life. It’s, in concept, attainable to make it over a day in case you’ve bought a cellphone just like the Galaxy S25 Extremely or iPhone 16 Professional Max, however solely with mild utilization. Certainly, battery life has all the time performed second fiddle for many smartphone makers, just because larger batteries are costly whereas being robust to take advantage of in advertising and marketing campaigns. A 6.9-inch display screen or a 10X telephoto lens is straight away spectacular — it is tougher to wow individuals with an additional two or three hours of runtime.

This 12 months, it looks as if each Apple and Samsung are engaged on the belief that we’ll be wowed by thinness, which is a mistake. It will entice some individuals, actually, however we’re not within the 2000s anymore — telephones have been skinny for a very long time. Nobody I do know is complaining about thickness. If something, the problem appears to be that telephones have grow to be unwieldly, getting thinner whereas concurrently rising taller, wider, and slipperier. Steel and glass could also be good aesthetically — however with out a case, skinny gadgets like my iPhone and my spouse’s OnePlus 9 5G really feel like they may slip out of my fingers with one fallacious gesture.

Associated

The OnePlus 13R shows OnePlus still needs to figure out budget phones

So near funds nirvana, but up to now.

A worrisome path for the long run

Misusing the newest tech

Galaxy S25 Edge on display at Galaxy Unpacked. January 2025.

Each the iPhone 17 Air and S25 Edge could also be primarily based on silicon-carbon batteries, a variation of the lithium-ion batteries we’re used to, merely with larger vitality density. That hasn’t been confirmed, however the tech has been utilized in a number of telephones already, and now appears poised to go mainstream.

In that case, I am nervous {that a} unhealthy precedent is rising. After I first heard about silicon-carbon, my hope was that we would get extra longevity out of telephones the identical dimension, or at the least equal longevity from barely smaller gadgets. Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we could possibly be hit with a wave of copycat gadgets, a few of which can additionally throw battery life beneath the bus. That will take the trade backward at a time when persons are extra depending on smartphones than ever.

To be truthful, Apple and Samsung could also be attempting to maintain elements prices down and retail costs in verify. Silicon-carbon batteries are costlier to provide in the meanwhile, so even attempting to match the capacities of ordinary lithium-ion batteries could also be tough with out a chunk into revenue margins. It could possibly be that after manufacturing prices come down, we’ll see capacities go up once more, fulfilling the brand new tech’s promise. Who is aware of — possibly Apple will really ship a two-day iPhone sooner or later.

Ought to the Air and Edge show profitable, we’ll inevitably be hit with a wave of copycat gadgets, a few of which can additionally throw battery life beneath the bus.

Alongside these strains, I am hopeful that each the Air and the Edge will serve a goal just like the iPhone X, which Apple launched in 2017. This was the primary iPhone with an OLED show and a

Face ID
digital camera, costing a then-unprecedented $999. Many individuals balked at it, however gross sales of the iPhone X, iPhone XS, and iPhone 11 Professional finally pushed manufacturing prices down, making it attainable to place each OLED and Face ID on the $799 iPhone 12. Lately, even the $599

iPhone 16e
shares these options.

Time will inform how briskly the brand new battery tech bridges over to helpful capacities at reasonably priced costs, if it does in any respect. I simply know that for now, Apple and Samsung can depend me out of gadgets that scale back battery life with none tangible advantages. It will hardly matter how cool a cellphone appears to be like sliding out of my pocket if I can not make it to the fitness center and again with out plugging into my automotive — or from Alberta to Texas with out a battery pack or charging throughout the flight’s layover. I suppose I am going to nonetheless be bringing my iPad alongside for mid-flight leisure.